softgarden
Ease of use
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Average: 8.8
Meets requirements
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Average: 8.8
Customer Support
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Average: 8.9
Ease of setup
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Average: 8.4
Global features
Setup & support
Data Privacy
Versions
Screenshots & Videos
softgarden Features
Platform
Customization
User, role, and access management
Reporting
Dashboards
Performance
Candidate management
Dashboards
Workflow building
Hiring processes tracking
Applicant data management
Candidate evaluations
Scheduling
Automated resume parsing
Candidate-facing statuses
Recruiting and onboarding
Onboarding
Sourcing and candidate identification
Applicant tracking
Interview scheduling
Sourcing
Social sourcing
Job posting
Candidate sourcing metrics
Candidate search
Career page configuration
Platform additional functionality
Sourcing and candidate identification
Applicant tracking
Platform functionality
Sourcing and candidate identification
Job posting
Interview scheduling
Applicant tracking
softgarden Pricing
softgarden Reviews (152)
Softgarden is frequently praised for its user-friendliness, efficient applicant tracking, and streamlined communication features. Many appreciate the ability to manage job postings across multiple platforms and customize career pages. However, some users find the initial setup complex and the interface occasionally unintuitive. There are also reports of occasional technical glitches and a desire for more flexible reporting options. Despite these drawbacks, Softgarden is generally seen as a valuable tool for simplifying and enhancing the recruitment process, especially for larger teams.
You’re seeing a preview version of our AI-assisted summary.
Your feedback helps us to improve this feature.