Listed in the following categories:
LEAP
4.6 (4)
Alternatives to LEAP
Item 1 of 8
This is how users rate the tool
0%
Ease of use
Category average: 90 %
0%
Customer support
Category average: 93 %
0%
Meets requirements
Category average: 92 %
0%
Ease of setup
Category average: 89 %
Related Links
Global features
Setup & support
Cloud
On-premise
24/7 support
German-speaking support
Data Privacy
Server location DE
Server location EU
Only EU companies affiliated
EU standard contract
Versions
Free version
Free trial
Screenshots & Videos
LEAP Pricing
Last edited: May 2026
Item 1 of 3
Free trial version (30 days)
Demo version
LEAP Reviews (4)
What users say about LEAP
There are not enough reviews yet to create a summary.
“Endlich ein Lead-to-Cash-System, das die deutsche Rechnungswelt ernst nimmt”
4.5
S
In the last 3 months
Stefan
Validated Reviewer
Managing Director at
spark+spine GmbH
- 1-50 employees
- Industry: Information Technology and Services
Use cases:
Professional Services Automation
What did you like?
Als DACH-Beratung war der entscheidende Punkt für uns, dass LEAP die deutsche Rechnungsrealität nicht als anrangig behandelt. Ausgangsrechnungen kommen wahlweise als XRechnung-XML und als ZUGFeRD-PDF heraus — eRechnung-konform, ohne ein zweites Tool. Eingehende Rechnungen laufen schon beim Upload durch einen §14-Check, der fehlende Pflichtangaben sofort markiert, statt dass wir es erst beim Verbuchen merken. Belege liegen GoBD-konform und unveränderbar mit vollständiger Änderungshistorie. Und am Monatsende erzeugt ein Klick ein sauberes, DATEV-fähiges Paket für unseren Steuerberater. Wir hatten vorher HubSpot, Odoo und eine separate Rechnungslösung im Test — international war vieles in Ordnung, aber bei §13b, §14 und GoBD mussten wir immer entweder Kompromisse machen oder Dinge nachbauen. LEAP bildet unseren End-to-End-Prozess ab, ohne dass wir an der deutschen Realität vorbei arbeiten müssen.
What did you not like?
Eine native DATEV-Live-Schnittstelle statt des (sehr sauberen) Export-Pakets wäre das i-Tüpfelchen. Und die Ersteinrichtung der Mandanten- und Vorlagenlogik sollte man bewusst einplanen — danach läuft es.
Which problems are you solving with the product?
Die Rückfragen-Schleife mit dem Steuerberater ist fast verschwunden, weil die Daten von Anfang an strukturiert und prüfbar sind. eRechnung ist für uns schlicht kein Thema mehr. Und wir haben ein System weniger zu pflegen, weil Vertrieb, Projekt, Zeit, Kosten und Rechnung zusammenhängen, statt in fünf Tools verteilt zu liegen.
“Great solution for managing both non-profits and companies”
4.5
M
In the last 3 months
Martin
Validated Reviewer
Marketing Manager at
bbttagroup
- 1-50 employees
- Industry: Automotive
Use cases:
Resource Management
What did you like?
We tried to use many tools, but only LEAP provided not only software but also process that works. Before we struggled with creating processes on how to operate the non-profit the most efficient way without having to do a lot of administration and with focus on what we actually do. We mainly use the CRM part of the system and what we really like is having tabs of connected entities available at all time (e.g. projects tab on company)
What did you not like?
We use AI a lot, but we are missing native integration of LEAP via MCP. However we talked to product team and they reassured us that is is on the way.
Which problems are you solving with the product?
It helps us manage contacts to other companies. It really helped us by providing own process instead of having to figure out and wasting a lot of time.
“Fixed our cashflow problem”
5.0
A
In the last 3 months
Andrej
Validated Reviewer
CEO at
The MiW s.r.o.
- 1-50 employees
- Industry: Computer Software
Use cases:
Service Provider ERPProfessional Services AutomationResource Management
+ 1 more
What did you like?
Our invoicing lag was a real cashflow issue — sometimes 6 weeks between work-done and invoice-sent. LEAP made it a single-day turnaround. I sleep better.
What did you not like?
The forms and some UI elements felt a bit dense on first use — the information is all there, but the layout could be a touch more scannable or visually separated for quicker reading.
That said, it was purely a first-impression thing. Once I got familiar with the system, it hasn’t slowed me down at all and I’ve had no real issues working in it day-to-day.
Which problems are you solving with the product?
LEAP has mainly solved our biggest cashflow headache: the long delay between completing work and actually sending invoices. Before LEAP, it could take 5–8 days from work done to invoice sent because everything lived in separate tools and spreadsheets. Now we go from worklog to invoice in a single day.
Beyond invoicing, it’s given us much better end-to-end visibility. We can see projects, delivery, and financials in one connected system instead of constantly switching between tools and chasing updates. This means we spot risks earlier, have real-time revenue insight, and make decisions with confidence instead of guesswork.
“Great tracking of my clients connected with invoicing!”
4.5
R
In the last 6 months
Robert
Validated Reviewer
Owner
- 1-50 employees
- Industry: Information Technology and Services
Use cases:
Professional Services Automation
What did you like?
As a freelancer, tracking and invoicing clients is a big part of my administration. After starting with LEAP, I realized how easy it is to do. And the new dashboard is great!
What did you not like?
I am missing the quotes creation, but based on the communication with the team behind LEAP, it will be released very soon.
Which problems are you solving with the product?
My client and project tracking and invoicing done in Excel was an awful experience. Now I can easily see the contacts and companies in their stages, track the project costs, and create invoices directly from LEAP.
Get in contact